Legal Opinion

The People v. Mark Jurgins

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 2015No. 178ÂPublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stein, J.

Defendant contends that his prior Washington, D.C. conviction for attempt to commit robbery is not equivalent to any New York felony and, therefore, did not provide a proper basis for his second felony offender adjudication. Because we agree that defendant was erroneously sentenced as a predicate felon based on that conviction, we reverse and remit for further proceedings.

L

In satisfaction of a 12-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to the top count of robbery in the first degree. Pursuant to the plea offer, defendant’s guilty plea was in exchange for a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. OlahNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. People v. SammsNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. People v. MunizNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. United States v. Le' Ardrus BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Pereira-GomezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  3. People v. BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. United States v. Fernando Sanchez, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API