Wharton v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
Petitioners successfully assert that respondent court abused its discretion as a matter of law when it denied their request for a jury trial.
Real party filed a lawsuit against petitioners for injuries which she claimed to have suffered in an automobile collision. On January 19, 1990, petitioners timely answered the complaint and served a demand for jury trial.
The case was ordered into arbitration and the arbitrator issued a ruling in favor of real party. On December 3, 1990, petitioners timely filed a request for a trial de novo and posted the sum of $150 which petitioners’…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jacob v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- In Re CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Byram v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Vinson v. Los Angeles Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Taylor v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Beilenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Tesoro Del Valle Master Homeowners Ass'n v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Massie v. AAR Western Skyways, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Johnson-Stovall v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Mackovksa v. Viewcrest Road Properties LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.