Legal Opinion

Wharton v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1991No. B057008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Petitioners successfully assert that respondent court abused its discretion as a matter of law when it denied their request for a jury trial.

Real party filed a lawsuit against petitioners for injuries which she claimed to have suffered in an automobile collision. On January 19, 1990, petitioners timely answered the complaint and served a demand for jury trial.

The case was ordered into arbitration and the arbitrator issued a ruling in favor of real party. On December 3, 1990, petitioners timely filed a request for a trial de novo and posted the sum of $150 which petitioners’…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jacob v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. In Re CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Byram v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Vinson v. Los Angeles Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Taylor v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beilenson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Tesoro Del Valle Master Homeowners Ass'n v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Massie v. AAR Western Skyways, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Johnson-Stovall v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. Mackovksa v. Viewcrest Road Properties LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API