Legal Opinion

Johnson-Stovall v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGE CTY.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 1993No. G014378PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J.

Once again we address a question which comes before us all too frequently—the right of a litigant to a jury after failing to post fees in a timely manner. We start with an admonition from Estate of Meeker (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 1099, 1106 [16 Cal.Rptr.2d 825]: “[W]e need to remember that all of us are here to serve the public and that this cannot be done when judges are inundated with fast-track statistics and cheerleader attitudes about case disposition numbers which never seem to take into account the rights of the parties.”

Here are the facts. The plaintiff sued numerous…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Byram v. Superior Ct. of Sacramento Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Estate of MeekerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Wharton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tesoro Del Valle Master Homeowners Ass'n v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Mackovksa v. Viewcrest Road Properties LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  3. TriCoast Builders, Inc. v. FonnegraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2024
  4. TriCoast Builders, Inc. v. FonnegraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API