Legal Opinion

Carstens Packing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Division of the Industrial Accident Board

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1943No. 7114Published

1Dissent

GIVENS, J.,

dissenting. — This court in Carstens Packing Co. v. Industrial Accident Board, 123 P. (2d) 1001, held that appellant was not a covered employer under the unemployment compensation statute as it existed ■ prior to 1941.1 The present action arises under the emphasized proviso of the amendatory sec. 18-5, chap. 182, 1941 Session Laws, pp. 393-4, which provides:

“The term ‘covered employment’ shall not include—

(t% i\i i]? * •

“ (f) Services performed in the employ of an individual owner or tenant operating a farm in connection with the cultivation of soil, the production and harvesting…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. First National Bank in St. Louis v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Burke v. MeadIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hood v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  5. Batt v. Unemployment Compensation Division of Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API