Legal Opinion
Bolan v. Lehigh Valley R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided May 10, 1948No. 225, Docket 20936PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
Appellant relies on four arguments: (1) That there was insufficient evidence to warrant a finding that defendant had violated the Boiler Inspection Act; (2) that the evidence was insufficient to warrant a finding that any such alleged violation constituted the proximate cause of the accident, and that there was no such finding; (3) that the verdict is based solely upon speculation and conjecture; and (4) that, when the jury returned for further instructions, they were improperly charged.
In support of its first argument, appellant relies chiefly on the undisputed fact that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Brady v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. MonroeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Morris v. Pennsylvania R. CoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Gebhardt v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Harry Henry and Robert E. Braye, Jr. v. A/s Ocean and John P. Pederson & Sons, and Third-Party & v. Pittston Stevedoring Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Jerry J. Calabritto v. New York, New Haven and Hartford Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Lester D. King v. Southern Pacific Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.