Bookholt v. General Motors Corp.

Wyatt, Presiding Justice.

1. The only question argued in this court is the constitutionality of the act above quoted. We will confine our decision to this question.

The statute in question is attacked as unconstitutional because “The classification of manufacturers apart from other remote sellers has no reasonable relation to the purpose of the statute, and therefore denies such manufacturers the equal protection of the laws.” There is no> merit in this contention. The act applies alike to all manufacturers of personal property, and it is reasonable to classify manufacturers apart from other…