Legal Opinion
Kuhn v. Village of East Syracuse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 7, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hubbs, P. J.:
The defendant village has a population of about 4,300. It has seventeen miles of improved sidewalk, mostly concrete. The walk where the accident in question occurred was constructed of concrete and was four feet wide. The street along which it runs is one of the principal streets of the village. The facts, stated in the most favorable light for the plaintiff, are, briefly, as follows:
On Sunday, April 2, 1922, at about noon, she and her daughter were returning home after attending church. There was about two inches of slush and snow on the sidewalk. She did not notice the hole in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beltz v. . City of YonkersNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Mullins v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Terry v. . Village of PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Merwin v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Wensley v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moore v. City of LockportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- Van Dyne v. Village of Seneca FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Norbury v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Norbury v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Van Dyne v. Village of Seneca FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929