Van Dyne v. Village of Seneca Falls
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentThompson, J.
The depth of the hole was two and one-half inches. It was located in the wheel track of a driveway on a side street of a village. Plaintiff’s foot was not caught nor was she tripped. In my view the holding of the trial judge that the difficulty complained of was not negligence as matter of law is right. In Hamilton v. City of Buffalo (173 N. Y. 72) plaintiff stepped upon the edge of a hole in a walk formed by the wheels of heavily loaded trucks which had caused a rounded depression, thirty-four inches long, twelve inches wide and four inches deep in the form of a letter V. In reversing the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hamilton v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Terry v. . Village of PerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Gastel v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Lalor v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Eger v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.