Legal Opinion

Van Dyne v. Village of Seneca Falls

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 7, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

The action is brought to recover for personal injuries suffered by plaintiff as a result of falling upon a defective sidewalk. The learned trial justice granted a nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s case. Upon this appeal the evidence is to be considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff. (Lombardi v. New York State Railways, 224 App. Div. 438.) So considered the evidence fairly shows that plaintiff was walking carefully along Green street in the village of Seneca Falls, which was a much-traveled street, and well built up, although plaintiff had used the street very infrequently and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Eger v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. Lombardi v. New York State RailwaysAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
  4. Kuhn v. Village of East SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moore v. City of LockportAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API