Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Peters

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1927No. 1762PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

PARSONS, J.

This case comes to this court on interlocutory appeal from an order denying complainant’s motion to amend her bill of complaint by striking out the names of twelve of the fourteen respondents named in the title.

The bill of complaint alleges in effect, among other things, that the complainant was born in Honolulu on the 22d day of September, 1894; that her father was David Fyfe Notley and her mother, the wife of the said David Fyfe Notley, was Helen Kamalu Notley; that said David Fyfe Notley died intestate in Honolulu on or about the 25th day of September,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Hardin v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Bishop & Co. v. Pacific Navigation Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Love v. LoveHawaii Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Honolulu Athletic Park, Ltd. v. LowryHawaii Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SacocoHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Harbrecht v. HarrisonHawaii Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API