Legal Opinion

Love v. Love

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal prom Circuit Judge, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, J.

This was a bill in equity to establish the plaintiff’s claim that he had a right to revoke a conveyance in trust made by him without reserving a power of revocation.

He bases the claim upon the facts that the conveyance was made voluntarily, without consideration from either of the beneficiaries and without his intention that the trust should be irrevocable but with the understanding and belief that it was revocable and could be rescinded at any time by him, and that he was not advised by his attorney who prepared the instrument that he ought to make…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Central Trust Co. v. Grant Locomotive WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Millican v. MillicanTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  3. Frederick's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  4. Burlington University v. BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  5. Viney v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Evans v. Bishop Trust Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  2. McMillan v. PetersHawaii Supreme Court · 1927
  3. In re the Ishida-Waiakamilo Legacy TrustHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. In re Ishida-Waiakamilo Legacy Trust Dated June 27, 2006.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API