Legal Opinion
McCray v. Humes
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1888No. 13,139PublishedCited by 15 opinions
From the Clinton Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, C. J.
This was a suit for‘partition, commenced •on the 7th day of March, 1881, in which William A. McCray and twelve others were plaintiffs, and John D. Humes was defendant.
The complaint alleged that the plaintiffs were the owners of one undivided half of two particularly described tracts of land in the county of Clinton, and that the defendant was the owner of the other undivided half of the same lands.
*104The pleadings were very voluminous. Various questions were reserved,or sought to be reserved, upon certain paragraphs of answer, upon a cross-complaint and upon other pleadings, but as the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bowen v. PrestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Bake v. SmileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Conwell v. CliffordIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Goodall v. MopleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Nutter v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Peden v. CavinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Geisendorff v. CobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Ferris v. UdellIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Piel v. DewittIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- City of Los Angeles v. HannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.