State v. Lane
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.
Defendant appeals, challenging the revocation of four separate probationary terms that defendant was serving for crimes that he had committed against different victims. The trial court found that defendant had violated a probationary term that prohibited him from consuming alcohol and imposed four prison terms as a sanction for that single violation. The trial court ordered some of those prison terms to run consecutively. OAR 213-012-0040(2)(a) provides that “[i]f more than one term of probationary supervision is revoked for a single supervision violation, the sentencing judge shall impose…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Barker v. IrelandOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Roseburg School District v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Gaona v. BLACKETTEROregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. NewellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LaneOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015