Legal Opinion
Miller v. Barnhart
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 27, 2006No. 06-10664UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Catherine Miller applied for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits, but the Commissioner of Social Security determined that Miller was not disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. Because the Commissioner’s decision is in accordance with law, we affirm.
I
Miller filed applications for disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits in 2000, alleging pain in her neck, shoulders, and left hip; carpal tunnel syndrome; major depression; panic disorder; and anxiety. The Commissioner denied her applications.
A hearing was held before…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Patricia GREENSPAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Arturo S. MARTINEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Brown v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Frank v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Birdwell v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
- Myers v. KijakaziDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
- Weaver v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2020
- Young v. SaulDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020