Legal Opinion
Brown v. Apfel
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1999No. 98-30848PublishedCited by 386 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Carmen Brdwn (“Brown”) appeals the district court’s ruling that retroactive application of the Contract with America Advancement Act (“CAAA”), Public Law 104-121, 110 Stat. 847 (1996), does not violate her due process rights. She also appeals the district court’s holding that substantial evidence supports the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying Brown Supplemental Social Security (“SSI”) and Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Claiming that she was disabled…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by386 opinions
- Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Cathleen Parra v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Newton v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Josephine L. Cage v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Boyd v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
381 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.