Legal Opinion

People v. Neal

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 3, 1999No. Docket 209603PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, C.J.

The prosecution appeals by right the order vacating defendant’s convictions of three counts of assaulting an employee of a place of confinement, MCL 750.197c; MSA 28.394(3), because, although proving that defendant was a prison inmate, the prosecution failed to prove that he was “lawfully” imprisoned. In People v Gaines, 223 Mich App 230; 566 NW2d 35 (1997), this Cotut held that, for purposes of the instant offense, a rational trier of fact could not find beyond a reasonable doubt that an inmate was lawfully imprisoned on the basis of evidence that he was incarcerated in a state prison. We…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. LemmonMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. BlytheMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. TruongMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. ClayMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. People v. NealMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. People of Michigan v. Robert L ChandlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. People v. ClayMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. People v. ClayMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API