People ex rel. Pixley v. Pond
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
— This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondents — the registrar and board of election commissioners — to count the votes in certain precincts of the city and county of San Francisco, alleged to have been cast for candidates to fill the office of supervisor for the first board of supervisors, and also those cast for candidates for the office of police commissioner. The first twelve petitioners named herein were candidates for the office of supervisor, and the last three named were candidates for the office of police commissioner. It is alleged that every one of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Staude v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Desmond v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Heinlen v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by6 opinions
- Diaz v. GonzalezSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Fulladosa v. CastroSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1919
- Savoy Realty Co. v. McGeeOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
- Mutual Benefit Life Ins v. McGeeOhio Court of Appeals · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.