Legal Opinion
Brizuela v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 29, 2012No. 09-797CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action for breach of an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission settlement agreement. Pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The matter is fully briefed. Oral argument is deemed unnecessary. For the reasons set out below we grant the motion to dismiss.
BACKGROUND
Francisco Brizuela, plaintiff, was employed as a mail handler in Amarillo, Texas, by the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) until he was terminated on April 3, 1985, during his initial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Donald A. Henke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Jeun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Brizuela v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Mata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Keehn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Lake Borgne Basin Levee District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.