United States v. Sun Growers of CA
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
Following the reversal of its conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(1)(A), Sun Growers of California (“Sun-Diamond”) 1 received a refund of the principal amount of the criminal fine that it had paid as part of its sentence, but its request for interest as of the date of payment was denied by the district court. Sun-Diamond contends that the district court erred by depositing the original fine in a non-interest bearing account, and, therefore, Sun-Diamond is entitled to recover constructive interest on the principal amount…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Munoz-FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Rene SpiropoulosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Sun Diamond GrowersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Lee SellersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Bevilacqua, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Ryan v. United States (In Re Ryan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Ryan v. United States (In Re Ryan)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Future Tech International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- United States v. St CyrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025