Legal Opinion

In RE WAKEFIELD v. Rhay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1960No. 35081Published

1Opinion of the Court

57 Wn.2d 168 (1960)

356 P.2d 596

In the Matter of the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of ROBERT WAKEFIELD, Petitioner,

v.

B.J. RHAY, as Superintendent of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.[1]

No. 35081.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

October 20, 1960.

Smithmoore P. Myers, for petitioner.

The Attorney General, Lawrence Ross and Stephen C. Way, Assistants, for respondent.

HUNTER, J.

The petitioner, Robert Wakefield, hereinafter called the defendant, was charged with the crime of grand larceny by embezzlement, and upon a plea of guilty, judgment was entered. He was sentenced to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. In RE WILKEN v. SquierWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  3. In RE PALMER v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. In RE WAKEFIELD v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. In Re Moon v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API