Legal Opinion

In RE WAKEFIELD v. Rhay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1960No. 35081PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*169Hunter, J.

The petitioner, Robert Wakefield, hereinafter called the defendant, was charged with the crime of grand larceny by embezzlement, and upon a plea of guilty, judgment was entered. He was sentenced to the state reformatory at Monroe and later transferred to the state penitentiary at Walla Walla. This matter comes before us on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, as an original petition filed in this court.

The question raised by the petition is whether the defendant was properly advised of his right to counsel and whether he competently and intelligently waived such right.

At the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In RE WILKEN v. SquierWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  2. In RE PALMER v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re Moon v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. In RE FRIEDBAUER v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. DechmannWashington Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Morgan v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  2. In RE AICHELE v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bloor v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. In RE RITCHIE v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In RE CHAPIN v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API