Legal Opinion

Ironton Lumber Co. v. Guyandotte Timber Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Cabell County. Action by the Ironton Lumber Company against the G-uyan-dotte Timber Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BRAinsrojsr, Judge:

In this action brought by the Ironton Lumber Company, against the Guyandotte Timber Company is the question whether the declaration is good. After averring that the plaintiff was engaged in the business of buying and selling saw logs and running them down the Guyandotte river into the Ohio river and thence to Ironton, and that the defendant operated a boom in the Guyandotte river for the purpose, of stopping logs, rafts and other timber of value, and that the boom was so constructed as to permit logs, rafts and timber, when desired by the owners, to pass without delay when…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hannum v. HillWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dallas v. WhitneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Wilson v. Guyandotte Timber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Adkins v. Guyandotte Timber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Long v. FoleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API