Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Guyandotte Timber Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1911Published

Error to Cirucit. Court, Cabell County. Action by E. E. Adkins and another against the Guyandotte Timber Company. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

RobiNSON, Judge:

The action is one for the recovery of damages from the loss of a raft of logs. Plaintiffs claim that the loss was caused by defendant, a boom company, in negligently and unlawfully blocking the channel of the river, so that the raft was detained therein until a flood came and swept it away.

The case is similar to that considered in Ironton Lumber Co. v. Guyandotte Timber Co., 68 W. Va. 358. The decision in that case, controls the determination of a material point in the case at hand. There is no averment in the declaration that plaintiffs requested defendant to open the boom…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ironton Lumber Co. v. Guyandotte Timber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API