Horne v. Hutchins
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Bile in Equity. Tlie facts were found by a referee and are sufficiently stated in the opinion. Transferred from the April term, 1900, of the supreme court'by Parsons, J.
1Opinion of the CourtRemick, J.
This is a bill in equity to determine water rights. The waters involved, mentioned in the order of their natural relation, are Smith’s pond, Whitten’s river, Crooked pond, and Smith’s river, in the town of Wolfeborough. Smith’s pond is the head of the series. Whitten’s river is the outlet to Smith’s pond, connects it with Crooked pond, and is about eighty rods in length. Smith’s river is the outlet of Crooked pond, is about one hundred rods in length, and empties into Lake Winnipiseogee. In the report of the referee, the printed case, and the briefs and arguments of counsel, three dams are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tyler v. WilkinsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1827
- Janes v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Grant v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1821
- Morrison v. MarquardtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Voorhees v. . BurchardNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Berry v. HutchinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905
- Cole v. Fred B. Pierce Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
- Horne v. HutchinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
- Sandford v. BossSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1912
- Newmarket Manufacturing Co. v. NottinghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.