Legal Opinion

Newmarket Manufacturing Co. v. Nottingham

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 3, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

It is the law of this jurisdiction that water rights are taxable to the owner thereof, although he does not own the fee in the underlying and supporting land. Winnipiseogee &c. Company v. Gilford, 64 N. H. 337.

The question here presented is whether the plaintiff owns any water rights situate in the defendant town. The instrument conferring upon the plaintiff certain rights is in the form of a covenant that the covenantor will perpetually manage the outflow of the reservoirs for the benefit of the covenantee. This confers a right to a beneficial use of the reservoirs. If the covenantor had…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kendall v. GreenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1893
  2. Smith v. FurbishSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  3. Barker v. Publishers' Paper Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
  4. Winnipiseogee Lake Cotton & Woolen Mfg. Co. v. GilfordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
  5. Arlington Mills v. SalemSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shelby Mutual Plate Glass & Casualty Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API