Legal Opinion

Voorhees v. . Burchard

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1873PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] No right or interest in the locus in quo is, by the terms of the conveyances, carried to Henry W. Rathbone or to Brady. But some things pass by a conveyance of lands, as incidents appendant and appurtenant thereto, though not named therein. This is the case with a right of way, or other easement appurtenant to land. So that, in the case of a devise of a mill and appurtenances, that is carried which was actually used by the testator in his lifetime as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Field v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  2. Barnes v. . PerineNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Huttemeier v. . AlbroNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  4. Comstock v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Tabor v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Doyle v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Parsons v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  3. Scott v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  4. Ogden v. . JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Spencer v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API