Voorhees v. . Burchard
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] No right or interest in the locus in quo is, by the terms of the conveyances, carried to Henry W. Rathbone or to Brady. But some things pass by a conveyance of lands, as incidents appendant and appurtenant thereto, though not named therein. This is the case with a right of way, or other easement appurtenant to land. So that, in the case of a devise of a mill and appurtenances, that is carried which was actually used by the testator in his lifetime as…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Field v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
- Barnes v. . PerineNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Huttemeier v. . AlbroNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Comstock v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Tabor v. . BradleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
3Cited by34 opinions
- Doyle v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Parsons v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Scott v. MooreSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
- Ogden v. . JenningsNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Spencer v. . KilmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.