(PC) Pavao v. Unknown
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ENRICO PAVAO, No. 2:21-cv-2082 TLN AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNKNOWN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983
18 and has requested authority pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915
to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF 19 Nos. 1, 2, 6. Plaintiff has also filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 3. This 20 proceeding was referred to this Court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). 21 For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.