Legal Opinion

(PC) Pavao v. Unknown

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 13, 2022No. 2:21-cv-02082Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ENRICO PAVAO, No. 2:21-cv-2082 TLN AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNKNOWN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

18 and has requested authority pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF 19 Nos. 1, 2, 6. Plaintiff has also filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. ECF No. 3. This 20 proceeding was referred to this Court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). 21 For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API