Legal Opinion
United States v. Brown
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 5, 1993No. Civ. A. 91-73030PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) (E.D.Mich. Jan. 1, 1992), the court dispensed with oral argument. For the reasons discussed below, the court will grant plaintiffs motion for summary judgment.
I. Background Facts
In this action, the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) is seeking to enforce the personal guaranties of defendants Paul Brown and Richard Bingham on a loan assigned to the SBA. The loan was initially made on July…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mill Alley Partners v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Gabriel Ride Control Products, Inc. v. Wolverine Auto Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Mazur v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Mazur v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Mazur v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007