Legal Opinion
Straub v. Collette
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 10, 2003No. Docket 236505PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmolensk, P.J.
This appeal, involving the issue whether plaintiff Daniel L. Straub suffered a “serious impairment of body function,” as defined in MCL 500.3135(7) of the no fault act, is once again before us by order of the Michigan Supreme Court, which, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, vacated our previous decision, Straub v Collette, 254 Mich App 454; 657 NW2d 178 (2002), and remanded the matter for consideration in light of its order in Kreiner v Fischer, 468 Mich 884 (2003). 468 Mich 918 (2003). The Supreme Court order of remand in Kreiner stated, in pertinent part:
The no-fault act, MCL 500.3135(7),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Kern v. Blethen-ColuniMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Kreiner v. FischerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Walker v. CaldwellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- May v. SommerfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kreiner v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Netter v. BowmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Kreiner v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Netter v. BowmanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006