State Ex Rel. H.D. Enterprises II, LLC v. City of Stoughton
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
*482ROGGENSACK, J.
H.D. Enterprises II appeals from an order of the circuit court granting summary judgment to the City of Stoughton. The circuit court concluded that the City provided adequate notice of the agenda for its common council meeting under § 19.84(2), Stats., and accordingly, did not violate the open meetings law. We also conclude that the notice provided was adequate and therefore, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
Pick 'N Save was building an addition to its grocery store in Stoughton and it applied for a Class A liquor license. Pursuant to the alcohol licensing requirements found in § 125.04(3),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. La Crosse Tribune v. Circuit Court for La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Truttschel v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- State v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State Ex Rel. Schaeve v. Van LareCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Opinion No. Oag 19-77, (1977), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Markel InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Buswell v. Tomah Area School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review BoardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Buswell v. Tomah Area School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- State Ex Rel. Buswell v. Tomah Area School DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.