Legal Opinion

Chilton v. Carpenter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 23, 1920No. 9722PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by P. E. Carpenter against Blake Chilton. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPitchford, J.

On February 17, 1917, defendant in error, plaintiff below, -filed re-plevin action- in the justice court against plaintiff in error, defendant below, alleging that he was the owner of the horse in controversy and praying for the recovery of the horse and damages. From the judgment in the justice court an appeal was taken to the district court. The parties will be designated as they appeared in the trial court. From the judgment rendered in -the district court in favor of the plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

The only assignments of error which, in our judgment, are necessary to consider are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brook v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  2. Shelby v. ShanerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Torrey v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Vaut v. GatlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Gatlin v. VautCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. O'Connell v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  2. In Re 1973 John Deere 4030 TractorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Joseph v. LesnevichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Riesinger's Jewelers, Inc. v. RobersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
  5. Cutshall v. YatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API