Vaut v. Gatlin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, McClain County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by Fannie Gatlin against A. and C. Vaut. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, C. J.
This is a suit in replevin, originally commenced on September 19, 1904, before a United States commissioner by Fannie Gatlin, defendant in error, against A. and C. Vaut, plaintiffs in error, to recover possession of a span of mules. For answer defendants denied, ore tenus, the allegations of the complaint, asserted title in themselves, and pleaded the statute of limitations in bar of plaintiff’s demand. There was judgment for plaintiff.' In the United States Court for the Southern District of Indian Territory, sitting at Purcell, to which the case was appealed, a demurrer was sustained to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. HodgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Sumner v. McFarlanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Knox v. HellumsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
- Gatlin v. VautCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1906
- Branson v. HecklerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re 1973 John Deere 4030 TractorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Joseph v. LesnevichNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Torrey v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Chilton v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Riesinger's Jewelers, Inc. v. RobersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.