Legal Opinion

Mercury Machine Co. v. Limbach

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1994No. 65107Published

1Opinion of the Court

James M. Porter, Judge.

Appellant Mercury Machine Company (“Mercury”) appeals from the decision and order of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) denying Mercury relief from a sales and use tax assessment by the appellee Tax Commissioner. The BTA denied relief on the grounds that certain computers and computer-related products purchased by Mercury are not exempt from tax because they are not used primarily in Mercury’s manufacturing operation to produce tangible personal property for sale. Mercury claims the computers and computer-related products are exempt under R.C. 5739.01(E)(2) and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Citizens Financial Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Canton Malleable Iron Co. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. BowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API