Hudson v. Markum
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Justice.
Scott Wesley Hudson appeals from a judgment ordering him to pay child support, damages for fraud, and attorney’s fees. In three points of error, appellant contends: (1) the trial court committed fundamental error by allowing the jury to question witnesses; and (2) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the jury’s finding that his net resources were $62,682 annually. 1
Factual and Procedural Background
Merry Markum (Markum) testified that she met appellant when she went to him for legal advice. Markum and appellant met several times. Eventually,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- United States v. Dan CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Fazzino v. Guido, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
- Powell v. Swanson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
3Cited by28 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BrittoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- In the Interest of P.C.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Juan Manuel Tellez v. City of Socorro, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.