Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Markum

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided March 26, 1997No. 05-93-00638-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Justice.

Scott Wesley Hudson appeals from a judgment ordering him to pay child support, damages for fraud, and attorney’s fees. In three points of error, appellant contends: (1) the trial court committed fundamental error by allowing the jury to question witnesses; and (2) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the jury’s finding that his net resources were $62,682 annually. 1

Factual and Procedural Background

Merry Markum (Markum) testified that she met appellant when she went to him for legal advice. Markum and appellant met several times. Eventually,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Morrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. United States v. Dan CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Fazzino v. Guido, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
  5. Powell v. Swanson, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrittoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. In the Interest of P.C.S.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  3. Juan Manuel Tellez v. City of Socorro, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2009
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API