Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Rhodes

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 17, 1953No. 1809PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. BROSMan, Judge:

A general court-martial convened at Pusan, Korea, convicted the accused, an Army lieutenant, of “black market” activities contrary to the provisions Of certain standing orders, and additionally of conspiracy to violate the same orders, the former offense proscribed by Article of War 96, 10 USC § 1568, and the latter by Article of War 95, 10 USC § 1567.1 In view of the character of the questions now raised, it is unnecessary to set out in detail the specific activities charged against the accused. The convening authority — with exceptions not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. DeLeoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. AskewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  3. United States v. HigginsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. VierraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. SimpsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API