Legal Opinion
Cave v. Rudolph
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 5, 1923No. 3799PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Acting Associate Justice.
On the 12th of August, 1921, the commissioners of the District of Columbia enacted a regulation, to become effective on the 30th day thereafter, in the following terms, to wit: ■ -
“Section 13. • A driver of a public vehicle for hire shall not stop or loiter upon a street except at a public hack stand or while actually taking on or discharging a passenger.” Article IV, section 13, Police Regulations of the District of Columbia.
The authority under which the commissioners acted when passing the regulation is to be found in an act of Congress (24 Stat. 368, § 1),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Davis & Farnum Manufacturing Co. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Third Ave. R.R. Co. v. . the Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Phillips v. Mayor of Stone MountainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Town of Green River v. Fuller Brush Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- National Association of Manufacturers v. McGrathDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1952
- National Remedy Co. v. HydeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
- McKee v. RudolphCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
- Bell v. HarlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.