Legal Opinion
McKee v. Rudolph
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 5, 1926No. 4316PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
In the lower court the appellants, as plaintiffs, filed a bill in equity, praying for an injunction to restrain the commissioners of the District of Columbia from enforcing the provisions of a certain Act of Congress approved May 17, 1924 (43 Stat. 120), upon the ground that the act is unconstitutional and void, and constitutes an invasion 'of appellants’ property and contract rights without due process of law. The lower court dismissed the bill for want of jurisdiction. • Hence this appeal.
If is alleged-in the bill that appellants conduct and operate a hotel in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bell v. HarlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
- Abbadessa v. Moore BusinessCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- In re Google Digital Advertising Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Mariotti v. Moore BusinessCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993