Legal Opinion

Stetson, Admr. v. Hoyt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1942No. 28738PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The question presented in this case is whether the administrator of a surviving spouse, by virtue of Section 10509-54, General Code (114 Ohio Laws, 413), is entitled to a lien upon the real property of her predeceased spouse for the balance in money over the appraised value of the personal property of such predeceased spouse selected by such surviving spouse in her lifetime, so as to make up the maximum allowance under the statute even though no further selection has been made by such surviving spouse.

The answer to this question depends upon the construction to be given the section of the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Raleigh v. RaleighOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Clancy v. Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Severing v. SeveringOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Estate of KuzmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Bauman v. HogueOhio Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API