Raleigh v. Raleigh
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStewart, J.
We shall consider the various findings of the Probate Court which were reversed by the Court of Appeals.
First, was the Probate Court authorized to order the estate of Bose Baleigh to pay the estate of Michael Baleigh the sum of $2,500 as property exempt from administration %
Section 10509-54, General Code (114 Ohio Laws, 413), provided:
“When a person dies leaving a surviving spouse, or minor child or children, the following property if selected as hereinafter provided, shall not be deemed assets or administered as such, but must be included and stated in the inventory of the estate: household…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davidson v. Miners & Mechanics Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
- Ambrose v. Rugg, Admx.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
- Miller v. Miller, Admr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
- In Re Estate of KnoflerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Spruance v. DarlingtonCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clancy v. Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
- Hall v. HallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- In Re Estate of MatusoffOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
- In Re Estate of BersinOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
- In re Estate of WittemanOhio Supreme Court · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.