Legal Opinion
ANDROS v. TINSLEY
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided May 30, 2025No. 7:23-cv-00135Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION JOHN ANDROS, , : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : CASE NO: 7:23-cv-135 (WLS) : : STEPHEN TINSLEY, , : : Defendants. : ___________________________________ ORDER On April 10, 2025, Defendants April Tinsley and Stephen Tinsley (together the “Tinsley Defendants”) filed a Notice of Appeal (Doc. 107) as to the Court’s Order (Doc. 103) denying in part the Tinsley Defendants’ motions to dismiss, and in particular the Court’s finding that the Tinsley Defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity. Currently before the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- George E. Apostol v. Mark Gallion, John Auriemma v. Fred Rice, and City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Thomas J. Mahone v. Walter S. Ray, Garfield Hammond, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Blinco v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.