State Tax Commission v. Peck
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS ROZAR, Superior Court Judge.
This case involves the Transaction Privilege Tax, A.R.S. § 42-1301 et seq. By a provision added in 1967, this tax, which is measured by gross proceeds, is imposed upon a person engaged in the business of “[1] easing or renting tangible personal property for a consideration”. A.R.S. § 42-1314, subsec. A, par. 2. The question before us is whether this provision renders the owners of coin-operated automatic laundry and car-washing establishments liable to pay the tax.
The plaintiff-appellee Peck owns a laundromat, in which are installed automatic washing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garcia v. HalsettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Feder v. CaliguiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- State Tax Commission v. Miami Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Arizona State Tax Commission v. Staggs Realty Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Brookshire v. Florida Bendix Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State Tax Commission v. PeckArizona Supreme Court · 1970