Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Halsett

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 8, 1970No. Civ. 24570PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CALDECOTT, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant following a jury trial.

On July 19, 1962, the appellant, Arthur Garcia, an 11-year-old boy, was injured in respondent’s Happy Coin Launderette in San Jose. Respondent had owned the business since 1959. Launderette Sales designed the store layout and sold and installed all of the equipment. Respondent had nothing to do with the design of the store or with installation of the equipment. The facilities of the launderette included four rows of coin-operated washing machines. The machines were Philco-Bendix,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Elmore v. American Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Western Electric Co. v. Pacent Reproducer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Pac. Tel. & Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pike v. Frank G. Hough Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Kasel v. Remington Arms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Ferrari v. Grand Canyon DoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API