Legal Opinion

Smith v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 29, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 373PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Layton, J.:

First, it is argued that the act just cited is a local or special law and violates Article II, Sec. 19 of the Delaware Constitution which states: “The General Assembly shall not pass any local or special law relating to * * * the laying out, opening, alteration, maintenance or vacation, in whole or in part of any road, highway, street, lane or alley; provided, however, that the General Assembly may by a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each House pass laws relating to the laying out, opening, alteration or maintenance of any road or highway which forms a continuous…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clendaniel v. ConradSupreme Court of Delaware · 1912
  2. Tribbett v. Village of MarcellusMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Mahnken v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  4. Schlosser v. Manor TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. City of Stamford v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tusso v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  2. Tusso v. SmithCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959
  3. Landes v. WolfSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  5. Tusso v. SmithCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API