Smith v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, J.:
First, it is argued that the act just cited is a local or special law and violates Article II, Sec. 19 of the Delaware Constitution which states: “The General Assembly shall not pass any local or special law relating to * * * the laying out, opening, alteration, maintenance or vacation, in whole or in part of any road, highway, street, lane or alley; provided, however, that the General Assembly may by a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each House pass laws relating to the laying out, opening, alteration or maintenance of any road or highway which forms a continuous…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clendaniel v. ConradSupreme Court of Delaware · 1912
- Tribbett v. Village of MarcellusMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Mahnken v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- Schlosser v. Manor TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- City of Stamford v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tusso v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
- Tusso v. SmithCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1959
- Landes v. WolfSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- Tusso v. SmithCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.