Legal Opinion

State v. Peele

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 25, 1972No. 7212SC697PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Appellant first assigns error to denial of his motion to quash the larceny count in the indictment. In support of this assignment he contends that, absent his consent, the trial court had no power to make any change in the bill of indictment as returned by the grand jury, that the larceny count in the bill of indictment in the form in which it had been returned a true bill by the grand jury charged him with larceny of certain particularly described items of property of Joel Noah as well as with larceny of property of Peter Hall, and that, having already been acquitted in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. United States v. Morris C. Goldberg, Also Known as Moe Goldberg and M. C. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  4. Harry S. Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  5. State v. CookeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. KeadleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. ReaganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API