Legal Opinion

City of Durham v. Pollard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 31, 1941PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

Tbe question for decision is tbis : Where S. M. Credle, tbe grantee of land under an unregistered deed, conveys tbe same to Gregory Sales Company, for' valuable consideration, by deed which is duly registered, is a judgment, thereafter obtained by tbe Merchants Bank against S. M. Oredle and docketed in the county where the land lies before the deed to Oredle is registered, a lien upon the land? The answer is “No.”

A docketed judgment, directing the payment of money, is a lien on the real property situated in the county in which the judgment is docketed and owned by the judgment debtor at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Warren v. . WillifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Glass v. Lynchburg Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Helsabeck v. . VassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Helsabeck v. VassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Gosney v. . McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McCullen v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. McCullen v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Eller v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. In Re SuggsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
  5. Dulin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API