City of Durham v. Pollard
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
Tbe question for decision is tbis : Where S. M. Credle, tbe grantee of land under an unregistered deed, conveys tbe same to Gregory Sales Company, for' valuable consideration, by deed which is duly registered, is a judgment, thereafter obtained by tbe Merchants Bank against S. M. Oredle and docketed in the county where the land lies before the deed to Oredle is registered, a lien upon the land? The answer is “No.”
A docketed judgment, directing the payment of money, is a lien on the real property situated in the county in which the judgment is docketed and owned by the judgment debtor at the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Warren v. . WillifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Glass v. Lynchburg Shoe Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Helsabeck v. . VassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Helsabeck v. VassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Gosney v. . McCullersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCullen v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- McCullen v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Eller v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- In Re SuggsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Dulin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.