Legal Opinion

Dulin v. Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1953No. 668PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEhviN, J.

The legal sufficiency of the complaint is not challenged by any of the parties. We nevertheless confront this reality at the threshold of the appeal: When the pleadings of the plaintiff are reduced to their factual averments, they do not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in favor of the plaintiff against any of the defendants.

The plaintiff undertakes to plead for relief in the alternative. He prays primarily for a judgment against the male defendant and his wife establishing the validity of his claim to the timber standing on the 25 acres described in his timber deed. He…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Collins v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Turner v. . GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Fordham v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Yount v. LoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Hill v. Pinelawn Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Bourne v. LAY & COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API