G.B. v. C.A.

*389Following a three-day evidentiary hearing, a judge of the District Court extended an abuse prevention order, which had been issued ex parte, for a period of one year. The defendant appeals,1 claiming that the *89evidence was insufficient to issue the G. L. c. 209A order (209A order) and that the doctrine of res judicata precludes entry of the order. We affirm.

1. Chapter 209A proceedings. a. December 4, 2015, complaint. We summarize the facts as the judge may have found them. Compare *390Aguilar v. Hernandez-Mendez, 66 Mass. App. Ct. 367, 367-368 & n.1, 848 N.E.2d 779 (2006). The parties were…