Legal Opinion

People v. Vester

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 8, 1933No. Docket No. 2428PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

On the trial of an action on each of three counts contained in an information filed against him, defendant was found guilty of the crime of robbery. Later, on the trial of the issue of his sanity at the time when each of such crimes was committed, defendant was found to have been sane. Although somewhat defective in form, if not in substance, it is understood that the appeal presented by defendant is from each judgment that was rendered against him in response to the corresponding verdict that was returned by the jury.

Perhaps the principal issue that is raised by appellant has reference to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Marshall v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. In Re BuchananCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Guagando v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  5. People v. WestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. Superior Court (Marks)California Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. GomezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. In Re DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API