Bonenfant v. American Fire Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Iosco. (Simpson, J.) Assumpsit on a fire insurance policy. Defendant brings error. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action is brought upon a fire insurance policy issued by defendant company August 27, 1887.
The declaration alleges that the defendant, by its policy of that date, insured the plaintiff for one year for $600 on his two-story frame building, occupied by a tenant as a dwelling and inn, the plaintiff being the owner and in possession of *655the property; that at the time of making the insurance, and from thence to the time of the loss, the plaintiff had an interest in the property to the amount of $1,000, being the sole owner of said property; that on March 10, 1888, the property was destroyed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clay Fire & Marine Insurance v. Huron Salt & Lumber Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Lyon v. Travelers' InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Ashworth v. Builders' Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Shackelton v. Sun Fire OfficeMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by16 opinions
- Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Agricultural Insurance v. Hamilton ex rel. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
- Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. CargillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Smith v. Lumbermen's Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Richards v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.