Legal Opinion

Greater Wilmington Transportation Authority v. Kline

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided December 15, 1971PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’HARA, Judge.

Plaintiff, a Transportation Authority created pursuant to Title 2, Delaware Code, Chapter 16, has initiated these proceedings under power of eminent domain to secure any right, title or interest that defendants might have in certain bus routes.

The record developed before trial in this action has clearly established that the only party claiming any present owner interest in the bus routes involved is Bernard J. Kline, d/b/a Diamond State Bus Lines (Kline). All the remaining defendants have either not appeared to contest this action or have indicated that their only…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State Upon the Information of Shartel v. Missouri Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  2. Commissioners of Cambridge v. Eastern Shore Public Service Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  3. Eisiminger v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Hutton v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Delaware Water & Air Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 1976
  2. Williams v. Public Service Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Citizens Utilities Co. v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. City of SeafordSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  5. Alterman Transport Lines, Inc. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API